LANGUAGE AND MIND
Books
The work examines some of the fundamental discoveries of contemporary linguistic theory, also known as generative grammar, to conclude that the basic computational architecture of human language is not linguistically specific; in that sense the architecture is likely to cover other cognitive domains unique to humans. One such domain is music; there must be many others such as arithmetic, kinship relations, map-making, and the like. Keeping to music in this work, it is claimed that, at a certain level of theoretical description, the mental systems that enter into the creation of linguistic and musical expressions are one and the same. The system so uncovered matches the Cartesian conception of mind in the right joints.
Reviews:
This book consists of an edited transcript of a lecture, delivered at the University of Delhi in January 1996, where Chomsky reflects on the overall history of the generative enterprise to relate it to some strikingly novel advances in grammatical theory, called the ‘Minimalist Program’. Integrating philosophical and conceptual issues with empirical research, he sketches some of the key issues that have characterised generative grammar in recent years to chart out the agenda for future research in language theory. The transcript tries to retain the lively, engaging style for which Chomsky is renowned as a public speaker. The discussion that followed the lecture was a lively event on the scope of linguistics, language acquisition, and the theory of the language and mind. In his extensive responses to a set of wide-ranging questions, Chomsky goes much beyond the issues raised in the lecture itself. The volume includes extensive clarificatory notes and references. While linguists interested in the internal history of generative linguistics will find this an immensely insightful work, it will be useful also for students and general readers who wish to gain an introductory knowledge of the discipline and its overall significance.
Review
3. The Primacy of Grammar The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2010; Prentice-Hall EEE, 2011; MIT Paperback 2012.
Biolinguistics has been able to maintain some distance from topics that are traditionally thought to be central to the study of language: meaning, concepts, truth-conditions, and communication. This is not to suggest that what currently falls under the non-grammatical aspects of language will never be a part of grammatical theory. But, as with matured sciences, the chances are that each such incorporation will be hard-fought, since it will have to be formulated, not due to pressures from ‘outside,’ but from within the evolving framework of biolinguistics. This restriction to grammar, so delinked from ‘language,’ opens the possibility that the computational system of human language may be involved in each cognitive system that requires similar computational resources. A mixture of analytical argumentation, varieties of empirical (including introspective) evidence, and some speculation suggests a picture in which a computational system consisting of very specific principles and operations is likely to be centrally involved in each articulatory symbol system that manifests unboundedness. In this restricted sense, the object of biolinguistics exemplifies the Cartesian picture of a united mind. In other words, the suggestion is that the following things converge: (a) the scientific character of biolinguistics, (b) its isolation from the rest of science and, thus, from the rest of human inquiry, (c) its basic explanatory form, namely, the computational-representational framework, and (d) the domains of its application.
Endorsements
It is a sign of maturity for any given field that a philosopher should reflect on its foundations. When the philosopher understands the field in its technical minutiae, it is a privilege, even a contribution. Moreover, given its approach and scope, a work like Mukherji's should reach a wide audience beyond linguistics, which is vital for the dissemination of the biolinguistics project that he elegantly introduces.
- Juan Uriagereka, Department of Linguistics, University of Maryland
This wide-ranging monograph provides a masterly and lucid overview of Chomsky's 'biolinguistics' enterprise and builds on it to offer a novel account of the nature of the human faculty of language. The core of that faculty is our tacit knowledge of grammar, the unique domain where the methodology of the hard sciences has been fruitfully applied to human cognition. In a tightly argued and challenging discussion, Mukherji goes on to suggest that there is a single computational system (essentially Chomsky's CHLthe computational system of human language) underlying all of language, music, mathematics and logic (the 'hominid set'). He defends this speculative thesis with insightful discussion of music, both Indian and Western, and ends with the striking suggestion that CHL is the unique computational system in nature. Mukherji's work is likely to trigger admiration and outrage in equal measure. It is an elegant achievement.
- Neil Smith, Department of Linguistics, University College London
Review
Mukherji's stance is that of a philosopher wanting to tease out what makes grammar special in the landscape of the human sciences and science as such....Overall, Mukherji urges that the computational system of human language is not language specific but restricted to a small number of human domains and thus defines the 'hominid set'. If this thesis turns out to be correct, the part of reality which the study of CHL reveals comes close to what one might expect from an empirical investigation of the mind.... However austere and bleak Mukherji's picture may seem at times, it is a bold and impressive attempt to reorganize the landscape of the philosophy of mind and language.
- Wolfram Hinzen et. al., Notre Dam Philosophical Reviews, 2010.
The Human Mind Through the Lens of Language: Generative Explorations. Bloomsbury Academic. 2022
Most living forms in nature display various cognitive abilities in their behaviour. However, except for humans, no other animal builds fires and wheels, navigates with maps and tells stories to other conspecifics. We can witness this unique feature of the human mind in almost everything humans do, such as painting, singing and cooking; there is an underlying sense of unity in the generative part of these systems despite wide differences in what they are about.
This book introduces, defends and develops a novel philosophical approach to the study of the generative mind. Nirmalangshu Mukherji argues for a single, species-specific generative principle that accounts for the human ability to combine symbolic forms without bound in each domain that falls under the generative mind.
Endorsements
‘‘Mukherji uses the scalpel of philosophy of science to reshape fundamental issues in the philosophy of mind. In his new book he pursues this strategy by showing how linguistics contributes to the enterprise: core principles of language not only further the understanding of, but actually characterize the human mind.’’
- Roberto Casati, Director, Nicod Institute, France
‘‘The volume is a very lively and well-informed presentation of an original take on human mentality: a distinctive kind of combinatorial capacity, which is not localised by content or material realisation. While Murkherji takes his lead from Chomsky, he ranges far afield, bringing to bear a host of disciplines in support of his thesis. The book is suitable for everyone from students to scholars in linguistics, psychology, and philosophy, all of whom will be informed and entertained.’’
- John Collins, Professor of Philosophy, University of East Anglia, UK
Review
Perhaps the most important message of Mukherji’s book is that the principles of linguistic theory do not simply form a part of mental life; they in fact help characterize the central notion of the human mind. By centralizing the generative structure-building capacity in his philosophy of mind, Mukherji successfully revives a more classical theme that linguistics should be seen as the ‘queen’ of the cognitive sciences.
- Elliot Murphy, Biolinguistics, 2023, Vol. 17, Article e13067
In this bold new book, Mukherji tests the logical limits of a quasi- Chomskyan picture of language to put forward a novel linguistically inspired re-engineering of the concept of the human mind... It is an incisive and expansive exploration of some of the most influential sets of ideas in the 20th and 21st century language sciences. Mukherji engages critically with the philosophies of mind and language to produce a fascinating neo-Cartesian account of what the mind could be given certain assumptions about what language is and how it evolved.
- Ryan M. Nefdt, The Philosophical Quarterly, April 2024
5. The Sound of Language, Forthcoming
Human languages are commonly viewed as systems of sound-meaning correlations. Classical Indian linguists such as Panini and Bhartihari viewed languages as constituted of Shabda which is a sound with a meaning; shabdas combine to form padas (terms/words) and vakyas (sentences), showing how sound-meaning correlations enter into the entire language system. Similarly, Aristotle thought of spoken words as sounds with a meaning; interestingly, he extends the idea to written words which he viewed as symbols of spoken words.
Recently, Noam Chomsky and his followers have rejected this classical view of language. In their view, human languages are primarily designed for construction of ‘inner thoughts’ which include cognitive images and conception of possible worlds. In contrast, the sound part of language is claimed to be ‘ancillary’ in the sense that this component may be viewed as added to the basic language system as an afterthought for externalization of thoughts. It is of some interest that this ‘thought-only’ view of language is implicitly shared by philosophers of language in the Frege-Russell logicist tradition since the sound of human languages plays no essential role in this conception of language.
In the proposed work, I challenge the thought-only conception of language from a variety of directions to develop a more substantive view of how human languages work. It is important to note at the outset that my challenge to this specific Chomskyan view does not lean either on (a) some ‘externalist’ conception of language or (b) primacy of communication, speech acts, dialogue etc., where the articulated sounds/speech play a central role. As with my earlier work, I continue to hold Chomsky’s basic neo-Cartesian internalist framework of generative grammar as the fulcrum of human language and mind. I just strongly disagree that this framework is embedded in a ‘thought-only’ conception of language. Hence, a sustained criticism of the specific Chomskyan view opens up the opportunity to examine what the sound system contributes to the overall generative conception of language.
Articles
Talks